Based on the EIGRP topology output, which statement is true regarding the route via 10.1.1.3?
- It is the successor route
- It is a feasible successor because its RD (2560) is less than the FD (2816) of the successor
- It is stuck in active state
- It cannot be a feasible successor because its composite metric is higher
Explanation: In EIGRP, a route is considered a feasible successor if it satisfies the feasibility condition. According to the sources, the feasibility condition requires that the Reported Distance (RD) of an alternative path must be strictly less than the Feasible Distance (FD) of the current successor route. In this specific scenario, since the RD of the route via 10.1.1.3 (2560) is lower than the FD of the successor (2816), the condition is met, allowing it to serve as a valid backup path in the EIGRP topology table.
Related exam: CCNP ENARSI v9 Course Final Exam
