The network administrator configured CoPP so that all HTTP and HTTPS traffic from the administrator device located at 172.16 1.99 toward the router CPU is limited to 500 kbps. Any traffic that exceeds this limit must be dropped. CoPP failed to capture the desired traffic and the CPU load is getting higher. Which two configurations resolve the issue? (Choose two.)
access-list 100 permit ip host 172.16.1.99 any ! class-map CM-ADMIN match access-group 100 ! policy-map PM-COPP class CM-ADMIN police 500000 conform-action transmit ! interface E0/0 service-policy input PM-COPP
A.
interface E0/0
no service-policy input PM-COPP
!
control-plane
service-policy input PM-COPP
B.
policy-map PM-COPP
class CM-ADMIN
no police 500000 conform-action transmit
police 500 conform-action transmit
!
control-plane
service-policy input PM-COPP
C.
no access-list 100
access-list 100 permit tcp host 172.16.1.99 any eq 80
D. no access-list 100
access-list 100 permit tcp host 172.16.1.99 any eq 80
access-list 100 permit tcp host 172.16.1.99 any eq 443
E. policy-map PM-COPP
class CM-ADMIN
no police 500000 conform-action transmit
police 500 conform-action transmit
Correct Answer: A
Exam with this question: CCNP ENARSI 300-410 Dumps
Choose two, why only A is correct? Besides none of these possible answers seems to satisfy.
- Create an ACL to identify traffic
- Create a class map to classify the traffic
- create a policy map to define the action taken against the traffic
- Create a service policy to enable policing on the control plane interface.
You guys need to make this question and answers more elaborated,
Please login or Register to submit your answer
Choose two, why only A is correct? Besides none of these possible answers seems to satisfy.
You guys need to make this question and answers more elaborated,