An IPv6 network topology using redistribution is experiencing reachability issues after migrating from an IPv4 deployment. How is the deployment of IPv6 redistribution different from what it is with IPv4?

Question:

An IPv6 network topology using redistribution is experiencing reachability issues after migrating from an IPv4 deployment. How is the deployment of IPv6 redistribution different from what it is with IPv4?

• The local interfaces participating in the source routing protocol are not redistributed unless the include-connected command is issued.
• The metric keyword is not required in redistributing OSPFv3 into EIGRPv6.
• The classless networks of a source routing protocol will only be redistributed with the use of the match keyword.
• The deployment of an IPv6 redistribution process does not support the implementation of route maps.

Explanation: In order to include the networks associated with the local interfaces participating in the routing process that is being redistributed, the include-connected keyword must be used.

Exam with this question: CCNP Enterprise: Advanced Routing (Version 8.0) – Conditional Forwarding and Route Redistribution Exam