Why is a reflexive ACL harder to spoof compared to an extended ACL that uses the established keyword?

IT Questions BankCategory: CCNA Security v1.2Why is a reflexive ACL harder to spoof compared to an extended ACL that uses the established keyword?

Why is a reflexive ACL harder to spoof compared to an extended ACL that uses the established keyword?

  • It provides a secure tunnel for returning traffic.
  • A reflexive ACL provides a lock-and-key function.
  • It allows incoming packets only after the 3-way handshake is completed.
  • It provides more detailed filter criteria to match an incoming packet before the packet is allowed through.

Exam with this question: CCNA Security Final Exam (CCNAS v1.2)

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments