1. What two commands will determine whether auto-summarization is in effect for RIP? (Choose two.)
- show running-config
- show ip route
- show ip interface
- show interface
- show ip protocols
2. Which statement regarding RIPv2 is correct?
- RIP version 2 will auto-summarize with the most efficient mask
- RIP version 2 will auto-summarize at the major network boundary
- RIP version 2 requires manual configuration for summarizing routes
- By default RIP version 2 and RIP version 1 do not handle route summarization the same
3. What is the default behavior of the RIP routing protocol if no version type is specified?
- send and receive version 1 updates only
- send version 1 updates only, receive version 1 and 2 updates
- receive version 1 updates only, send version 1 and 2 updates
- send and receive both version 1 and 2 updates
4. What condition would RIPv2 allow that RIPv1 would not allow?
- 16 hops from one end of the network to the other
- redistribution of EIGRP
- a 192.168.0.0/16 network
- a router with more than 3 interfaces
5. How do RIP v1 and RIP v2 differ?
- Only RIP v1 provides authentication in its updates
- Only RIP v1 uses split horizon to prevent routing loops
- Only RIP v2 uses 16 hops as the metric value for infinite distance
- Only RIP v2 sends subnet mask information with its routing updates
6. Refer to the exhibit. The exhibit shows partial results from the debug ip rip events command on router B. What is the likely cause of the debug messages?
- Routers A and E are sending malformed updates
- RIP configuration on router B does not include networks connected to the serial interfaces
- Router B serial interfaces are not configured correctly
- Router B is running a different version of RIP than A and E
7. Refer to the exhibit. If all routers are running RIP version 2, why is there no route for the 192.168.1.32/27 network?
- Rip version 2 does not send subnet masks in its updates
- Router A is not setup with RIP as a routing protocol
- Rip version 2 will auto summarize routes by default
- Router B is not setup to advertise the 192.168.1.64/30 network
8. Refer to the exhibit. What can be determined from this output?
- A show ip route on a router 2 hops away will see the 192.168.1.32/27 network in its routing table
- The Serial0/0/0 interface is configured with the passive interface command
- The router is passing the subnet mask along with the network in its updates
- All the routers must be Cisco routers since the network is using RIP version 2